Asian Security and the Trouble with North Korea | ISPI
Skip to main content

Search form

  • INSTITUTE
  • CLERICI PALACE
  • CONTACT US
  • MEDMED

  • login
  • EN
  • IT
Home
  • INSTITUTE
  • CLERICI PALACE
  • CONTACT US
  • MEDMED
  • Home
  • RESEARCH
    • CENTRES
    • Asia
    • Cybersecurity
    • Europe and Global Governance
    • Business Scenarios
    • Middle East and North Africa
    • Radicalization and International Terrorism
    • Russia, Caucasus and Central Asia
    • Infrastructure
    • PROGRAMMES
    • Africa
    • Energy Security
    • Global cities
    • Latin America
    • Migration
    • Religions and International Relations
    • Transatlantic Relations
  • ISPI SCHOOL
  • Publications
  • EVENTS
  • CORPORATE PROGRAMME
    • about us
    • Closed-door meetings
    • Scenario Conferences
    • Members
    • Executive Education
  • EXPERTS

  • Home
  • RESEARCH
    • CENTRES
    • Asia
    • Cybersecurity
    • Europe and Global Governance
    • Business Scenarios
    • Middle East and North Africa
    • Radicalization and International Terrorism
    • Russia, Caucasus and Central Asia
    • Infrastructure
    • PROGRAMMES
    • Africa
    • Energy Security
    • Global cities
    • Latin America
    • Migration
    • Religions and International Relations
    • Transatlantic Relations
  • ISPI SCHOOL
  • Publications
  • EVENTS
  • CORPORATE PROGRAMME
    • about us
    • Closed-door meetings
    • Scenario Conferences
    • Members
    • Executive Education
  • EXPERTS
Studies

Asian Security and the Trouble with North Korea

Axel Berkofsky
17 July 2012

North Korea will continue to remain East Asia’s trouble-maker. Pyongyang’s active missile and nuclear programs leave the region’s main powers - China, Japan, South Korea and the ‘offshore balancer’ US - stay on alert, sometimes higher, sometimes lower. Pyongyang has no intention whatsoever to give up and dismantle its missile and nuclear programs as it would leave the country with no bargaining tools to employ for its political blackmail policies. China remains a staunch supporter of the current status quo, i.e. a divided Korean peninsula, not least because a reunified Korea would almost by default become a US ally. Japan on the other hand has lost patience with North Korea long ago. Although a member of the 6-Party Talks, Tokyo’s influence in the multilateral forum has decreased close to zero. While it remains yet to seen whether Pyongyang is in the months ahead prepared to go down that road, it cannot be excluded that the country’s new political leadership decides to conduct a third nuclear test seeking to demonstrate military strength to those who are - at least in principle - prepared to offer economic and financial benefits in return for Pyongyang taking the finger off the trigger. 

 

Read: Asian Security and the Trouble with North Korea

Read more:

China’s Quest for the Global South
Filippo Fasulo
Co-Head, ISPI Centre on Business Scenarios
For China, the 14th BRICS Summit Is a Chance to Sponsor Its World View
Filippo Fasulo
ISPI
How the Ukraine War Fuels Great Power Competition in Asia
Filippo Fasulo
ISPI
,
Giulia Sciorati
ISPI and University of Trento
Biden al contrattacco economico
Filippo Fasulo
ISPI
New Delhi on the Ukraine War: Between Eurasia and the Indo-Pacific Region
Jagannath Panda
Institute for Security and Development Policy
,
Eerishika Pankaj
Organisation for Research on China and Asia
The War in Ukraine and its Potential Implications for Central Asia: China’s Perspective
Elżbieta Proń
University of Silesia in Katowice

Tags

North Corea Asia China Security Nuclear Bomb Japan
Versione stampabile

Autori

Axel Berkofsky
Associate Research Fellow

GET OUR UPDATES

SUBSCRIBE TO NEWSLETTER

About ISPI - Work with us - Experts - Contact - For Media - Privacy

ISPI (Italian Institute for International Political Studies) - Palazzo Clerici (Via Clerici 5 - 20121 Milan) - P.IVA IT02141980157