The Global Race for Antarctica: China vs the Rest of the World? | ISPI
Salta al contenuto principale

Form di ricerca

  • ISTITUTO
  • PALAZZO CLERICI
  • MEDMED

  • login
  • EN
  • IT
Home
  • ISTITUTO
  • PALAZZO CLERICI
  • MEDMED
  • Home
  • RICERCA
    • OSSERVATORI
    • Asia
    • Cybersecurity
    • Europa e Governance Globale
    • Geoeconomia
    • Medio Oriente e Nord Africa
    • Radicalizzazione e Terrorismo Internazionale
    • Russia, Caucaso e Asia Centrale
    • Infrastrutture
    • PROGRAMMI
    • Africa
    • America Latina
    • Global Cities
    • Migrazioni
    • Relazioni transatlantiche
    • Religioni e relazioni internazionali
    • Sicurezza energetica
  • ISPI SCHOOL
  • PUBBLICAZIONI
  • EVENTI
  • PER IMPRESE
    • cosa facciamo
    • Incontri ristretti
    • Conferenze di scenario
    • Future Leaders Program
    • I Nostri Soci
  • ANALISTI

  • Home
  • RICERCA
    • OSSERVATORI
    • Asia
    • Cybersecurity
    • Europa e Governance Globale
    • Geoeconomia
    • Medio Oriente e Nord Africa
    • Radicalizzazione e Terrorismo Internazionale
    • Russia, Caucaso e Asia Centrale
    • Infrastrutture
    • PROGRAMMI
    • Africa
    • America Latina
    • Global Cities
    • Migrazioni
    • Relazioni transatlantiche
    • Religioni e relazioni internazionali
    • Sicurezza energetica
  • ISPI SCHOOL
  • PUBBLICAZIONI
  • EVENTI
  • PER IMPRESE
    • cosa facciamo
    • Incontri ristretti
    • Conferenze di scenario
    • Future Leaders Program
    • I Nostri Soci
  • ANALISTI
Dossier
The Global Race for Antarctica: China vs the Rest of the World?
Giulia Sciorati
23 Agosto 2019

As Earth’s southernmost continent, Antarctica lives by norms of its own. It is a de facto condominium over which seven sovereign states maintain territorial claims, but that is governed by a multilateral Antarctic Treaty System (ATS). China’s growing interests in the “White Continent” have spurred responses from the actors that have much at stake in Antarctica, such as Australia, Brazil and Russia, as well as the European Union. These actors conduct joint activities on Antarctica's harsh land in the fields of tourism and scientific research. Which are the specific interests of these powers? What is the geopolitical status of the continent? And what’s in store for one of the last sanctuaries left on Earth?

China’s Polar Strategy through the Looking Glass
Giulia Sciorati
ISPI China Programme
China’s Antarctic Program and the Antarctic Treaty System
Sen Wang
Zhejiang University
The Future of the White Continent and the Need for its Democratization
Yelena Yermakova
University of Oslo
Brazil’s Antarctic Future
Ignacio J. Cardone
University of São Paulo
Australia’s Key Role in Antarctica, in Defence of Its Environment
Marco Genovesi
University of Nottingham
The Engagement of the European Union in the Governance of Antarctica
Nils Vanstappen
Leuven Centre for Global Governance Studies

Ti potrebbero interessare anche:

An Unrewarding Show: Online Summit of China-CEE 17+1 Platform
Richard Q. Turcsanyi
Director of Central European Institute of Asian Studies (CEIAS)
G7 e Conferenza di Monaco, doppio banco di prova per USA e UE
Verso il G20 italiano: cibo, sviluppo, infrastrutture
T20 Italy Inception Conference Highlights
Il mondo al tempo del Covid: l’ora dell’Europa?
Alessandro Colombo
Head, Osservatorio ISPI sulle Relazioni Transatlantiche
,
Paolo Magri
Vice Presidente Esecutivo ISPI
Europe-China Relations in 2021: Prospects and Constraints
Alessia Amighini
Co-Head, ISPI Asia Centre
,
Giulia Sciorati
ISPI Asia Centre, China Programme

Tags

China business scenarios antarctica governance
Versione stampabile
Download PDF

EDITED BY

Giulia Sciorati
ISPI China Programme

Click to see the GIF image

SEGUICI E RICEVI LE NOSTRE NEWS

Iscriviti alla newsletter

Chi siamo - Lavora con noi - Analisti - Contatti - Ufficio stampa - Privacy

ISPI (Istituto per gli Studi di Politica Internazionale) - Palazzo Clerici (Via Clerici 5 - 20121 Milano) - P.IVA IT02141980157