When the decision about shifting the election date to the European Parliament to May was taken, an exceptional opportunity for the party campaigners in the Central and Eastern Europe seemed to arise. It had to be a relatively easy task to combine the stocktaking of the decade of EU membership with the positive narrative as to the future (mainly domestic) challenges, with the politicians ensuring to be the only ones able to properly cope with them and find the right answers.
Poco si parla di Europa in questa campagna per le elezioni europee, strumentalizzate per la politica interna. E i nostri leader sono presuntuosi, nel senso che non riconoscono e non spiegano la forte interdipendenza che ci lega all’Europa.
Recent events in Ukraine have been depicted in many ways depending on who is narrating the story of the Euromaidan and what is his perception of the symbolic meaning of the actions under scrutiny: as a revolution against a corrupt political system, as a civil war, as a genuine proof of the Euro-dream for change of Ukrainian people who are ready to die defending their ideals, as a coup d’état and so on.
Il governo di Bucarest ha comunicato che i lavoratori rumeni non potranno lavorare alla costruzione di nuovi insediamenti nella West Bank. È questa la dichiarazione ufficiale diramata dalla radio dell’Esercito israeliano martedì 10 dicembre che aggiunge tensione alle relazioni già complesse fra Israele e Unione europea.
Introduction: the “original sin” of the euro
Ahead of the Vilnius Summit (November 28-29, 2013) EU foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton promised that the high-level meeting would “open a new chapter” in the relationship between the EU and its eastern neighbours. What came out of the Summit, however, resembles discovering to read an old chapter with Ukraine’s decision not to sign the Association Agreement (AA) being the unexpected bitter surprise for Brussels.