Non ci saranno festeggiamenti, né suoneranno le campane. Sul muro del numero 10 di Downing Street sarà proiettato un countdown per la mezzanotte, l’ora della Brexit. Ma quali sono le reali conseguenze dell’uscita della Regno Unito dall’Unione?
Boris Johnson has kept his word, and the United Kingdom will finally leave the European Union at the end of January. In little more than six months as Prime Minister, Johnson has succeeded where Theresa May failed: strengthening the conservatives in a national election and carrying the UK out of the EU without further ado. Those who thought that this would close the last chapter of the Brexit saga, however, should reconsider their guess. With the beginning of the transition period, new pages still have to be written.
“We have no eternal allies, and we have no perpetual enemies. Our interests are eternal and perpetual, and those interests it is our duty to follow”. (Lord Palmerston).
Boris Johnson called an election in December 2019. At the time government, parliament, and UK politics in general was log-jammed by the Brexit issue. Unable to move forward towards Brexit or back towards another referendum on remaining in the EU, Johnson cast the election in terms of pitching “the people” against parliament, causing some to see this as a populist election. Parliament was portrayed as divided, divisive and as an institution blocking Brexit.
The vote to leave the European Union marked a turning point in British politics. But it was also a potentially important moment for the UK’s role in global politics. For some of its supporters, at least, Brexit was in part about unleashing the potential of ‘Global Britain,’ allowing the country to trade and collaborate with countries across the world in a way it either could not or had not when in the European Union.
The victory of Boris Johnson in the UK general election could be considered a national endorsement for Brexit, but should not be judged as a breakthrough in reconciliating the factions that are splitting the kingdom. For at least two reasons. First of all, the result of the election confirms that the voters for and against Brexit are more or less the same as they were in 2016, when the referendum took place. Three years of excruciating debate has not shifted opinions in any clear direction.
Boris Johnson has kept his word. The United Kingdom has left the European Union on Friday. However, Brexit is far from over. London and Brussels now need to negotiate the terms of their future relationship in just 11 months (during the 'transition period'). So a new Brexit cliff edge may be just around the corner, with a hard Brexit still an option.
The British played a crucial role in the European Union as advocates for market liberalization and efficient regulation, transparent and accountable bureaucracy, and widening market access. Their fingerprints can be found on the completion of the internal market, the reform of the European Commission, the expansion to Central and Eastern Europe, and the continuing focus on the western Balkans and the eastern Mediterranean.
Brexit alla fine c'è stata e la Gran Bretagna è fuori dall'Unione Europea. Ma sbaglierebbe chi pensasse che la questione sia finalmente chiusa. Anzi a ben vedere la vera Brexit inizia solo ora. Dal 31 gennaio è iniziato infatti un “periodo di transizione” che durerà fino a fine anno e durante il quale Londra si impegna ad applicare le normative europee e a pagare la propria quota di contributi al bilancio comunitario.
Boris Johnson resta al numero 10 di Downing Street e conquista una solida maggioranza parlamentare, mentre l’opposizione laburista incassa una sconfitta senza precedenti. Il risultato delle elezioni di ieri nel Regno Unito dice due cose: la prima è che lo spostamento a sinistra dei Laburisti, sotto la leadership di Jeremy Corbyn, non ha pagato; e la seconda è che il regno di sua Maestà – a tre anni dal referendum ‘leave or remain’ – ha scelto di nuovo Brexit.
